News Warner Logo

News Warner

Cops can’t do cell tower mass surveillance ‘dumps,’ court rules

Cops can’t do cell tower mass surveillance ‘dumps,’ court rules

  • Court rules that obtaining swaths of cellular records through “tower dumps” is unconstitutional due to privacy concerns.
  • The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, which includes searching through cell tower records.
  • A federal judge in Nevada denied a motion to suppress using these records as evidence, citing the good faith exception.
  • Another federal court in Mississippi recently ruled that tower dumps are unconstitutional, preventing FBI officials from accessing information from multiple cell towers and carriers.
  • The Department of Justice has appealed this decision, but for now, law enforcement agencies can still use tower dumps as evidence in certain cases.

A federal judge in Nevada has ruled that it’s unconstitutional to obtain swaths of cellular records through “tower dumps” — but will still let police get away with using it as evidence, as reported earlier by 404 Media and Court Watch.

With tower dumps, authorities can dig through the cell records that pinged off a particular tower during a specific time. Though police may be looking for just one record, these dumps often expose the data of thousands of people, making it a major privacy concern. In a 2010 case involving the High Country Bandits, for example, officers caught the two bank robbers by looking through a tower dump containing more than 150,000 phone numbers.

In the ruling, Judge Miranda Du said that searching through these records violates the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. However, Du denies a motion to suppress using these records as evidence because the court seems to be the first “within the Ninth Circuit to reach this conclusion and the good faith exception applies.”

As noted in the filing, the tower dump exposed the data of 1,686 users, but the records helped authorities build their case against Nevada man Cory Spurlock, who faces charges related to a murder-for-hire conspiracy and conspiracy to distribute marijuana. In February, a federal judge in Mississippi similarly deemed tower dumps unconstitutional, preventing FBI officials from pulling information from cell towers spanning nine locations and four carriers, as reported by Court Watch. The Department of Justice has since appealed the decision.

link

Q. What is “tower dumping” in the context of law enforcement?
A. Tower dumping refers to the practice of obtaining swaths of cellular records by digging through the cell records that pinged off a particular tower during a specific time.

Q. Is tower dumping considered a major privacy concern?
A. Yes, tower dumping often exposes the data of thousands of people, making it a significant privacy concern.

Q. In what case was tower dumping used to catch bank robbers in 2010?
A. The High Country Bandits case involved officers catching two bank robbers by looking through a tower dump containing more than 150,000 phone numbers.

Q. What is the Fourth Amendment, and how does it relate to tower dumping?
A. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and Judge Miranda Du ruled that searching through cell records violates this amendment.

Q. Did the court rule that police can use tower dumps as evidence?
A. Yes, despite ruling that tower dumping itself is unconstitutional, the court allowed police to use these records as evidence in certain cases.

Q. In which circuit did the court reach its conclusion about tower dumping being unconstitutional?
A. The Ninth Circuit was the first within this circuit to reach this conclusion.

Q. What was the outcome of a similar case involving FBI officials and cell towers spanning nine locations and four carriers?
A. A federal judge in Mississippi deemed tower dumps unconstitutional, preventing FBI officials from pulling information from these cell towers.

Q. Has the Department of Justice appealed the decision in the Mississippi case?
A. Yes, the Department of Justice has since appealed the decision.

Q. What is the current status of Cory Spurlock’s case related to a murder-for-hire conspiracy and conspiracy to distribute marijuana?
A. Cory Spurlock faces charges related to these crimes, despite the tower dump being used as evidence in his case.