News Warner Logo

News Warner

Zuckerberg tells court he made WhatsApp and Instagram better

Zuckerberg tells court he made WhatsApp and Instagram better

  • Zuckerberg testified for 13 hours over three days in a Federal Trade Commission antitrust lawsuit to defend Meta’s acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram.
  • The FTC argues that Zuckerberg bought these apps to eliminate competition, not to improve them, citing concerns about private messaging apps becoming social media platforms.
  • Zuckerberg acknowledged that he was worried about the potential for private messaging apps to become social media businesses, but claimed it was a “something I thought about” rather than a primary motivation.
  • Despite this, Zuckerberg expressed satisfaction with the acquisitions, stating “I’d do it again” when asked if he would buy WhatsApp in 2014.
  • The trial is ongoing, with Meta seeking to refute the FTC’s core argument and demonstrate that the acquisitions were made to improve user experience and expand Meta’s offerings.

Towards the end of Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony in a Washington, DC courthouse, a smile flashed across his face.

Meta’s lead attorney, Mark Hansen, had asked the CEO if he was “happy” about paying $19 billion for WhatsApp in 2014.

Zuckerberg flashed a grin, took a brief pause, and responded, “I’d do it again.”

Over the last decade, the growing scale of Instagram and WhatsApp cemented Meta as one of the most powerful companies on earth. Now, the US government, via a Federal Trade Commission antitrust lawsuit, is trying to unwind those acquisitions through a trial that began on April 14th. Zuckerberg spent roughly 13 hours across three days answering questions from the FTC and Meta lawyers. Much of that time on Wednesday was devoted to attempting to refute one core argument: that he bought both apps to take them out and not to make them better.

The FTC contends that WhatsApp was acquired because Zuckerberg and his executives were worried at the time that private messaging apps would grow into fully-fledged social media businesses. From the witness stand, Zuckerberg acknowledged that it was “something I thought about,” but that he thought it would be “extremel …

Read the full story at The Verge.

link

Q. Why did Mark Zuckerberg testify in a Washington, DC courthouse?
A. He was being questioned by the US government via a Federal Trade Commission antitrust lawsuit.

Q. What was the main topic of discussion during Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony?
A. The FTC’s argument that he bought WhatsApp and Instagram to take them out, rather than making them better.

Q. How did Mark Zuckerberg respond when asked if he was “happy” about paying $19 billion for WhatsApp in 2014?
A. He flashed a grin and said, “I’d do it again.”

Q. What is the core argument being made by the FTC against Meta?
A. That Mark Zuckerberg bought WhatsApp and Instagram to take them out, rather than making them better.

Q. Why did Mark Zuckerberg think he would buy WhatsApp in 2014?
A. He thought private messaging apps would grow into fully-fledged social media businesses.

Q. How long did Mark Zuckerberg spend testifying across three days?
A. Roughly 13 hours.

Q. What was the focus of much of Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony on Wednesday?
A. Attempting to refute the FTC’s argument that he bought WhatsApp and Instagram to take them out, rather than making them better.

Q. Why is Meta being sued by the US government via a Federal Trade Commission antitrust lawsuit?
A. To unwind the acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram.

Q. What did Mark Zuckerberg say when asked if he was worried about private messaging apps growing into social media businesses?
A. “Something I thought about,” but that he thought it would be “extreme” to think otherwise.

Q. How powerful has Meta become since acquiring WhatsApp and Instagram?
A. One of the most powerful companies on earth, thanks in part to the growing scale of both apps.