News Warner Logo

News Warner

Samples from the moon reveal scary risks to astronauts

Samples from the moon reveal scary risks to astronauts

  • New research on lunar samples reveals scary risks to astronauts, including dust that could interfere with spacesuit seals, micrometeorites that could puncture suits, and breathing in dust that causes respiratory issues.
  • The study used nanoscale analysis tools for the first time to examine space-weathered lunar samples, providing insights into the phenomenon of space weathering and its role in forming water on the moon.
  • The researchers found damage on the rock samples, including changes in optical signatures, which helped them understand how the lunar surface formed and evolved, as well as the chemical composition and radiation history of the samples.
  • The study’s findings have significant implications for NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to sustain a human presence on the moon, and could inform strategies for mitigating risks associated with space weathering and micrometeorites.
  • The next phase of research will combine nanoscale analysis tools with new technology to analyze Apollo lunar samples that have been in storage for over 50 years, aiming to build models that can feed into orbital maps of the moon and support humanity’s deep-space exploration goals.

A footprint from an astronaut's boot on the surface of the moon.

New lunar sample research could help protect astronauts and uncover the origins of water on the moon.

Dust and rocks residing on the surface of the moon take a beating in space. Without a protective magnetosphere and atmosphere like Earth’s, the lunar surface faces continual particle bombardment from solar wind, cosmic rays, and micrometeoroids. This constant assault leads to space weathering.

The new NASA-funded research offers fresh insights into the phenomenon of space weathering.

Examining Apollo lunar samples at the nanoscale, researchers have revealed risks to human space missions and the possible role of space weathering in forming some of the water on the moon.

Most previous studies of the moon involved instruments mapping it from orbit. In contrast, this study allowed researchers to spatially map a nanoscale sample while simultaneously analyzing optical signatures of Apollo lunar samples from different regions of the lunar surfaceโ€”and to extract information about the chemical composition of the lunar surface and radiation history.

The findings appear in Scientific Reports.

“The presence of water on the moon is critical for the Artemis program. It’s necessary for sustaining any human presence and it’s a particularly important source for oxygen and hydrogen, the molecules derived from splitting water,” says Thomas Orlando, a’ professor in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Georgia Tech, cofounder and former director of the Georgia Tech Center for Space Technology and Research, and principal investigator of Georgia Tech’s Center for Lunar Environment and Volatile Exploration Research (CLEVER).

As a NASA SSERVI (Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute), CLEVER is an approved NASA laboratory for analysis of lunar samples and includes investigators from multiple institutes and universities across the US and Europe. Research areas include how solar wind and micrometeorites produce volatiles, such as water, molecular oxygen, methane, and hydrogen, which are all crucial to supporting human activity on the moon.

For this work, the Georgia Tech team also tapped the University of Georgia (UGA) Nano-Optics Laboratory run by Professor Yohannes Abate in the physics and astronomy department. While UGA is a member of CLEVER, its nano-FTIR spectroscopy and nanoscale imaging equipment was historically used for semiconductor physics, not space science.

“This is the first time these tools have been applied to space-weathered lunar samples, and it’s the first we’ve been able to see good signatures of space weathering at the nanoscale,” says Orlando.

Normal spectrometers are at a much larger scale, with the ability to see more bulk properties of the soil, explains Phillip Stancil, professor and head of the UGA physics department.

The UGA equipment enabled the study of samples “in tens of nanometers.” To illustrate how small nanoscale is, Stancil says a hydrogen atom is .05 nanometers, so 1 nm is the size of 20 atoms if placed side by side. The spectrometers provide high-resolution details of the lunar grains down to hundreds of atoms.

“We can look at an almost atomistic level to understand how this rock was formed, its history, and how it was processed in space,” Stancil says.

“You can learn a lot about how the atom positions change and how they are disrupted due to radiation by looking at the tiny sample at an atomistic level,” says Orlando, noting that a lot of damage is done at the nanoscale level. They can determine if the culprit is space weathering or from a process left over during the rock’s formation and crystallization.

The researchers found damage on the rock samples, including changes in the optical signatures. That insight helped them understand how the lunar surface formed and evolved but also provided “a really good idea of the rocks’ chemical composition and how they changed when irradiated,” says Orlando.

Some of the optical signatures also showed trapped electron states, which are typically missing atoms and vacancies in the atomic lattice. When the grains are irradiated, some atoms are removed, and the electrons get trapped. The types of traps and how deep they are, in terms of energy, can help determine the radiation history of the moon. The trapped electrons can also lead to charging, which can generate an electrostatic spark. On the moon, this could be a problem for astronauts, exploration vehicles, and equipment.

“There is also a difference in the chemical signatures. Certain areas had more neodymium (a chemical element also found in the Earth’s crust) or chromium (an essential trace mineral), which are made by radioactive decay,” Orlando says. The relative amounts and locations of these atoms imply an external source like micrometeorites.

Radiation and its effects on the dust and lunar surface pose dangers to people, and the main protection is the spacesuit.

Orlando sees three key risks.

First, the dust could interfere with spacesuits’ seals.

Second, micrometeorites could puncture a spacesuit. These high-velocity particles form after breaking off from larger chunks of debris. Like solar storms, they are hard to predict, and they’re dangerous because they come in at high-impact velocities of 5 kilometers per second or higher.

“Those are bullets, so they will penetrate the spacesuits,” Orlando says.

Third, astronauts could breathe in dust left on the suits, causing respiratory issues. NASA is studying many approaches for dust removal and mitigation.

The next research phase will involve combining the UGA analysis tools with a new tool from Georgia Tech that will be used to analyze Apollo lunar samples that have been in storage for over 50 years.

“We will combine two very sophisticated analysis tools to look at these samples in a level of detail that I don’t think has been done before,” Orlando says.

The goal is to build models that can feed into orbital maps of the moon. To get there, the Georgia Tech and UGA team will need to go from nanoscale to the full macro scale to show what’s happening on the lunar surface and the location of water and other key resources, including methane, needed to support humanity’s moon and deep-space exploration goals.

Source: Georgia Tech

The post Samples from the moon reveal scary risks to astronauts appeared first on Futurity.

link

Q. What is space weathering, and how does it affect the lunar surface?
A. Space weathering refers to the damage caused by solar wind, cosmic rays, and micrometeoroids to the lunar surface, leading to changes in its optical signatures and chemical composition.

Q. Why is studying Apollo lunar samples important for NASA’s Artemis program?
A. The presence of water on the moon is critical for sustaining any human presence, and studying Apollo samples can provide insights into the origins of water on the moon, which is necessary for oxygen and hydrogen production.

Q. What are some of the risks associated with space weathering to astronauts?
A. Space weathering poses dangers to people, including interference with spacesuit seals, micrometeorites that could puncture a spacesuit, and breathing in dust left on suits, causing respiratory issues.

Q. How did researchers analyze Apollo lunar samples using UGA’s nano-FTIR spectroscopy equipment?
A. Researchers used UGA’s nano-FTIR spectroscopy equipment to study samples at the nanoscale, providing high-resolution details of the lunar grains down to hundreds of atoms.

Q. What can be learned about the radiation history of the moon by analyzing trapped electron states in the optical signatures of Apollo samples?
A. The types and depths of trapped electron states can help determine the radiation history of the moon, which is crucial for understanding how the lunar surface formed and evolved.

Q. How does the presence of neodymium and chromium in Apollo samples indicate an external source like micrometeorites?
A. The relative amounts and locations of these atoms imply an external source like micrometeorites, as they are produced by radioactive decay.

Q. What is the main protection against radiation on the moon for astronauts?
A. The spacesuit provides the main protection against radiation on the moon for astronauts.

Q. Why is it important to study space weathering and its effects on the lunar surface?
A. Studying space weathering can provide insights into how the lunar surface formed and evolved, as well as help understand the risks associated with space weathering to astronauts and inform strategies for mitigating these risks.

Q. What is the next research phase involving Georgia Tech and UGA researchers?
A. The next research phase will involve combining the UGA analysis tools with a new tool from Georgia Tech to analyze Apollo lunar samples that have been in storage for over 50 years, providing a level of detail not previously achieved.